Although scientists are often interested in assessing how changing a single one of the factors will affect the whole system, it can be impractical, or even impossible, to set up an experiment where just one variable can be changed and evaluated. For example, if you wanted to predict how building a new car-manufacturing plant would affect the local air quality, one way would be to just determine how much air pollution the factory would contribute. But this model is imprecise. There are other related events that might occur when a new factory is built.
For example, the factory would create jobs, and more people might move to the area to take advantage of those jobs. These people would buy local homes, drive cars, start related industries, and so forth. All these events would also impact local air quality. So, a more-accurate evaluation would take into account as many of the covariates as possible. Taking covariates into account can also help increase your power of detecting a change.
For example, say you were conducting a study on the ability of a new drug to lower cholesterol. Cholesterol levels are determined by a large number of factors, including: gender, age, family history, diet, physical activity, and weight. In a study with mice, you could control for all of these factors—you could have mice with identical genetics, all of the same age and gender, that are fed the same diet, that weigh the same amount, and perform the same exercise regime.
But it would be impossible to do a similar fully controlled study with humans. And each factor you try to control, the fewer people would be available to your study and the more difficult it would be to recruit subjects.
An alternative is to limit only some of the variables, and measure the remaining covariates in order to factor them into your final data-analysis model. Using the model, you can mathematically subtract out the effects of the covariates and still see the effects of the variable in which you're interested: the cholesterol-lowering drug.
These resources provide additional information about how to design experiments and increase the signal-to-noise ratio in scientific data:. Menu Science Projects. Project Guides. View Site Map. Science Projects. Grade Levels. Physical Science. Earth and Environmental Science. Behavioral and Social Science.
Increasing the Ability of an Experiment to Measure an Effect. Quantitative Variables Technique for increasing the signal-to-noise ratio What is it? When is it helpful? Examples of when to use it Making repeated measurements Measuring a single item or event more than once to eliminate error in measuring.
More measurements of a single event lead to greater confidence in calculating an accurate average measurement. Especially helpful if an individual measurement may have a lot of variability; because it has to be made quickly, it is hard to determine the exact endpoint, or is technically difficult and thus prone to errors. Does not add value if the measurement is clear-cut, like the answer to a survey question about a person's age or measuring the dimensions of a room in meters.
How many drops of acid does it take to change the color of this indicator solution? Run the reaction several times on aliquots of the same solution.
Test the same exact graphics card multiple times. How long does this turtle spend underwater before surfacing for a breath? Observe the same turtle multiple times. Increasing the sample size Increasing the number of items, or people, that you are collecting data from increases the probability that what you are observing is indicative of the whole population. Using common units, scientists from different countries and cultures can easily interpret each others' results.
SI units include meters m for length, liters L for volume, kilograms kg for mass, seconds s for time, Kelvin K for temperature, ampere A for electrical current, mole mol for amount and candela cd for luminous intensity. When taking scientific measurements, it is important to be both accurate and precise.
Accuracy represents how close a measurement comes to its true value. This is important because bad equipment, poor data processing or human error can lead to inaccurate results that are not very close to the truth. Precision is how close a series of measurements of the same thing are to each other.
Measurements that are imprecise do not properly identify random errors and can yield a widespread result. Measurements are only as accurate as the limitations of the measuring instrument allow. For example, a ruler marked in millimeters is accurate only up to the millimeter because that is the smallest unit available.
When making a measurement, its accuracy must be preserved. This is achieved through "significant figures. The significant figures in a measurement are all the known digits plus the first uncertain digits. When she pulls it out of the water, her colleagues estimate the weight of the fish. Their estimates are When they weigh the fish upon returning to shore, the actual weight is Write your own scenario illustrating the difference between accuracy and precision.
Swap your scenario with a classmate. A dart player can see how accurate his or her dart throws are by comparing the location of the thrown darts to the target, the bulls-eye of the dartboard. How is this model different from scientists who are measuring a natural phenomenon?
Is there a way for scientists to determine how accurate their measurements are? Explain your answer. Special Feature Type: Practices of Science. Accuracy is much easier to define: the accuracy of an experiment is how close the final result is to the correct or accepted value. The closer it is, the more accurate the experiment. The accuracy can be improved through the experimental method if each single measurement is made more accurate, e.
Implementing a method that reduces systematic errors will improve accuracy. Note that, precision is a separate aspect which is not directly related to accuracy. Precision refers to the maximum resolution or the number of significant figures in a measurement. For example, a clock has a precision of 1 s, whereas a stopwatch has a precision of 0. Whether or not a measurement is accurate does not depend on the precision.
Reliability and accuracy are separate aspects of an experiment and the relationship between them is sometimes misunderstood. A result can be reliable and inaccurate if you get the same incorrect answer all the time e.
We can use shooting at a target as an example to further clarify our understanding of reliability and accuracy:. Some steps can be taken to improve both accuracy and reliability.
0コメント